Site Plan
Site Improvement Goals
By spring 2012, the percentage of 3rd graders meeting reading
MSP standards will meet or exceed the state standard and the number of students
on grade level (1st-3rd) will exceed 70% as measured by
the SRI on the final spring assessment in 2012.
Mathematics
By spring 2012, the percentage of 3rd graders meeting math MSP
standards will meet or exceed the state standard and at least 70% of students
at each grade level will pass math unit tests at 80% or higher.
Writing
60% of students will meet standard on the 4th grade MSP by the
year 2012 and at least 60% of students K-3 will meet standard in writing
according to grade level rubrics.
Science
By Spring 2012, increase student achievement on the MSP to meet or exceed
state performance through annual increases in achievement.
Environment
We will reduce physical discipline referrals by 5% per year from 2008-09
through 2011-12.
Technology
By spring 2012, the percentage of 3rd graders meeting reading
MSP standards will meet or exceed the state standard and the number of students
on grade level (1st-3rd) will exceed 70% as measured by
the SRI on the final spring assessment in 2012 and by spring 2012, the
percentage of 3rd graders meeting math MSP standards will meet or
exceed the state standard and at least 70% of students at each grade level will
pass math unit tests at 80% or higher.
Reading Action Plan
School Improvement Goal: By spring 2012, the percentage of 3rd
graders meeting reading MSP standards will meet or exceed the state standard
and the number of students on grade level (1st-3rd) will
exceed 70% as measured by the SRI on the final spring assessment in
2012.
Strategy:. We will increase reading comprehension.
Rationale: Students
with solid comprehension skills have an increase in reading achievement.
|
Activities
to Achieve this Goal: What
actions will occur? What steps will staff take? |
Professional
Development: How will
staff acquire the necessary skills and attitudes to implement this activity? |
Timeline: When will
this strategy or action begin or end? |
Resources
Available: What are
the existing and new resources that will be used to accomplish this activity? |
Who is
Responsible? Who is Involved? Who will provide the leadership? Who will do
the work? |
Monitoring
Effectiveness: What
on-going FORMATIVE evidence will be gathered to show this activity is making
a difference in student outcomes? |
|
Focused
instruction on four core strategies: clarification, summarization,
predicting, and questioning |
SFA
training |
On-going |
SFA
training days Utilization
of "Universal Strategies" from SFA |
Roberta
McElroy |
SRI
assessments |
|
Small
group interventions using "Language For Learning" support materials (including ELL, SPED, homeless, Migrant, Low-Income) |
Training
in "Language For learning" |
On-going |
"Language
For Learning" curriculum, Title 1 funds |
Roberta
McElroy Sharon
Price Linda
Parsons |
Roots,
SRI testing Weekly
assessments w/"Language For Learning" |
|
Tutoring
of struggling students (including ELL,
SPED, homeless, Migrant, Low-Income) |
On-going
tutor training and monitoring |
On-going |
Title
1 LAP |
Roberta
McElroy Karen
Danielson Shawn
Merryman |
Roots,
SRI, Phonics assessments |
|
Procedures
for evaluating success in reaching this goal: What
SUMMATIVE evidence will be used to show this activity is making a difference
in student outcomes? Analysis of MSP scores and Roots/SRI tests
in reading. |
|||||
Math Action Plan
School Improvement Goal: By spring 2012, the percentage of 3rd
graders meeting math MSP standards will meet or exceed the state standard and
at least 70% of students at each grade level will pass math unit tests at 80%
or higher.
Strategy: Work
toward an authentic PLC model of collaboration by using common assessment data
to inform our instruction and assist all students who are not meeting standard.
This includes ELL, SPED, Migrant, and Low-Income students.
Rationale: Collaboration
time among teachers is one of the most common characteristics of a high
performing school, regardless of demographics.
|
Activities
to Achieve this Goal: What
actions will occur? What steps will staff take? |
Professional
Development: How will
staff acquire the necessary skills and attitudes to implement this activity? |
Timeline: When will
this strategy or action begin or end? |
Resources
Available: What are
the existing and new resources that will be used to accomplish this activity? |
Who is
Responsible? Who is Involved? Who will provide the leadership? Who will do
the work? |
Monitoring
Effectiveness: What
on-going FORMATIVE evidence will be gathered to show this activity is making
a difference in student outcomes? |
|
As
grade level teams, learn new math standards and new math materials, aligning
curriculum, assessment, and instruction. |
Meet
with Tom Boyce throughout the year as a grade level team. |
August
2009-May 2010 |
Tom
Boyce, Collaboration Dollars to pay for subs |
Tom
Boyce leads, K- Sue Beck 1- Suzanne Heap 2-
Laura Schouten 3 -Amber Oien |
Newly
created unit assessments. |
|
Meet
as collaborative teams scheduled monthly to review unit assessments, analyze
data, and craft instructional interventions for ALL students (including ELL, SPED, homeless, Migrant,
Low-Income) based on results. |
Teams
will meet according to grade level schedules and Ann Carper will support as
PLC facilitator/trainer. |
Mid
September 2009-May 2010 |
Ann
Carper will help us to utilize PLC Concepts. Tom Boyce will facilitate
writing of common assessments based on new PEs. |
Tom
Boyce Ann
Carper K- Sue Beck 1- Suzanne Heap 2-
Laura Schouten 3 - Amber Oien |
Newly
created unit assessments. |
|
Extended Learning for all Kindergarten students with a
focus on mathematics unit development aligned to state standards |
Meet
with Tom Boyce throughout the year as a grade level team. |
August
2009-May 2010 |
Tom
Boyce, Collaboration Dollars to pay for subs |
Tom
Boyce leads, K- Sue Beck |
Newly
created unit assessments. |
|
, |
|||||
Writing Action Plan
School Improvement Goal: 60% of students will meet standard on the 4th
grade MSP by the year 2012 and at least 60% of students K-3 will meet standard
in writing according to grade level rubrics.
Strategy: Collect common assessment data and collaborate to inform our instruction
and assist all students who are not meeting standard. This includes ELL, SPED,
Migrant, and Low-Income students.
Rationale:
Collaborating and implementing research based practices will increase student
skills when implemented correctly.
|
Activities
to Achieve this Goal: What
actions will occur? What steps will staff take? |
Professional
Development: How will
staff acquire the necessary skills and attitudes to implement this activity? |
Timeline: When will
this strategy or action begin or end? |
Resources
Available: What are
the existing and new resources that will be used to accomplish this activity? |
Who is
Responsible? Who is Involved? Who will provide the leadership? Who will do
the work? |
Monitoring
Effectiveness: What
on-going FORMATIVE evidence will be gathered to show this activity is making
a difference in student outcomes? |
|
Meet
as collaborative teams as scheduled by grade levels to create unit checklists,
review writing samples, analyze results, and craft instructional
interventions for ALL students (including
ELL, SPED, homeless Migrant, Low-Income) based on results. |
Teams
will meet as scheduled by grade levels and Ann Carper will support as PLC
facilitator/trainer. |
Mid
September 2009-May 2010 |
Ann
Carper will help us to utilize PLC Concepts. Collaboration dollars and
district provided writing scoring money. |
Ann
Carper K-
Sue Beck 1-Suzanne Heap 2-
Laura Schouten 3- Amber Oien |
Writer's
workshop student writing samples. |
Procedures
for evaluating success in reaching this goal: What
SUMMATIVE evidence will be used to show this activity is making a
difference in student outcomes? Analysis of 4th grade MSP writing
scores and comparison of student writing with grade level rubrics.
Science Action Plan
School Improvement Goal: By
Spring 2012, increase student achievement on the MSP to meet or exceed state
performance through annual increases in achievement.
Strategy: Provide staff support in science
Rationale: Research based practices will increase student skills when implemented correctly.
|
Activities to achieve this goal: What actions will
occur? What steps will staff take? |
Professional Development: How will staff acquire
the necessary skills and attitudes to implement the activity? |
Timeline: When will this strategy
or action begin and end? |
Resources available: What are the existing
and new resources that will be used to accomplish the activity? |
Who is responsible? Who is involved? Who will provide the
leadership? Who will do the work? |
Monitoring effectiveness: What on-going FORMATIVE
evidence will be gathered to show this activity is making a difference in
student outcomes? |
|
Implement Foss Science
Curriculum |
LASER science opportunities |
On-going |
Foss Kits LASER programs |
Teachers |
Completion of kits by
teachers. |
|
Meet
as collaborative teams as scheduled by grade levels to determine science
concepts and assessments for kits. |
Team
will meet as scheduled by grade levels |
Mid
September 2009-May 2010 |
Ann
Carper will help us to utilize PLC Concepts. Collaboration dollars. |
K-
Sue Beck 1- Suzanne Heap 2-
Laura Schouten 3-Amber Oien |
Completion
of science notebooks by students |
|
Implement
updates of State Science Standards |
Standards
Update training |
September
2009- June 2012 |
ESD
112 & Washington State trainers |
Lori
Gabler |
List
of staff trained |
|
Procedures
for evaluating success in reaching this goal: What
SUMMATIVE evidence will be used to show this activity is making a difference in
student outcomes? Analysis of 5th Grade MSP science scores. |
|||||
School
Environment Action Plan
School
Improvement Goal: We will reduce physical discipline
referrals by 5% per year from 2008-09 through 2011-12.
Strategy:. Work toward common language and practices through the use of "Love and
Logic", Core Beliefs, PLC's, and use of Peer Mediation through peer mediation
and playground instruction modules.
Rationale: Schools
with a common structure and beliefs, with consistent practices, produce students
with fewer behavior problems.
|
Activities
to Achieve this Goal: What
actions will occur? What steps will staff take? |
Professional
Development: How will
staff acquire the necessary skills and attitudes to implement this activity? |
Timeline: When will
this strategy or action begin or end? |
Resources
Available: What are
the existing and new resources that will be used to accomplish this activity? |
Who is
Responsible? Who is Involved? Who will provide the leadership? Who will do
the work? |
Monitoring
Effectiveness: What
on-going FORMATIVE evidence will be gathered to show this activity is making
a difference in student outcomes? |
|
Consistently
follow and practice Core Beliefs and "Love and Logic" strategies. |
"Love
and Logic" training Core
Belief reminders "From
Innocence to Entitlement" book study |
On-going |
"Love
and Logic" materials, tapes, training manuals. Staff
development budget Title
1 budget |
Glenn
Spinnie Merran
Mahoney |
Improvement
of student behavior in common areas, discipline data reduction in numbers of
students engaging in poor decisions. |
|
Implementation
of playground instructional modules and interventions |
Staff
updates |
On-going |
Playground
staff |
Merran
Mahoney Sharon
Price |
Reduction
in aggressive behavior referrals |
Procedures
for evaluating success in reaching this goal: What
SUMMATIVE evidence will be used to show this activity is making a
difference in student outcomes? Analysis of building discipline data.
|
2009-2012
Technology Plan Building-Level Technology and Learning Plan District Name: Centralia Building
Name: Jefferson Lincoln
|
||||||
|
Goal Title: Math and reading SMART Goal Statement:
By
spring 2012, the percentage of 3rd graders meeting reading MSP
standards will meet or exceed the state standard and the number of students
on grade level (1st-3rd) will exceed 70% as measured by
the SRI on the final spring assessment in 2012 and by spring 2012, the
percentage of 3rd graders meeting math MSP standards will meet or
exceed the state standard and at least 70% of students at each grade level
will pass math unit tests at 80% or higher. |
||||||
|
Strategy: Use of
technology tools for sharing thinking of students with teacher guidance Rationale:
When students share their thinking with peers,
communication
skills improve which positively impacts achievement. Evaluation
Procedure: Analysis of math and
reading WASL scores. |
||||||
|
Activity/Task |
Professional
Development |
Evaluation (Measurable Change) |
People
Involved |
Starting and Ending Dates |
Resources:
Description |
Cost
/Funding Source |
|
Continue to purchase/obtain laptop computers for
classroom curriculum and instruction |
Training from
experienced teachers |
Technology
inventory |
Glenn Spinnie Jena Newby |
August 2009 - June 2012 |
Title 1 & Low
Income Schools grant |
Estimated cost:
$15,000 - Tech budgets, grants |
|
Research computer programs to build skills and provide
individualized programming |
Compass, Everyday
Math and other software programs |
Student data on
usage, test scores |
Jena Newby |
November 2009 - June 2012 |
Research math
software |
Research costs
LAP & Title 1 funds |
|
Implement Investigations Math and coaching technology
components |
Unit development
and correlation |
Developed units Number of staff
utilizing materials |
Tom Boyce |
August 2009 - June 2012 |
Unit plans and
spreadsheet with resources embedded |
Training &
Computers See above |
|
Implement writing coaching technology components |
Unit development
and correlation |
Developed units Number of staff
utilizing materials |
Ann Carper |
August 2009 - June 2012 |
Spreadsheet with
resources |
Training &
Computers See above |
|
Technology staff development |
e-mail, internet,
PowerPoint, Excel, etc |
Increased staff
use of programs |
staff |
August 2009 - June 2012 |
PD budget |
PD budget |
Check one of these statements (depending
upon the length of your building's SIP plan):
____
Our building's school
improvement plan is for one year only. We will complete and submit this updated
form as we update our SIP plan each year.
____
Our building's school
improvement plan is for two years only. We will complete and submit this
updated form as we update our SIP plan in two years.
_X__ Our
building's school improvement plan is for three years, and will not need to be
updated during the district's 3-year technology plan.
